The Hindu PAPER Summary for UPSC

 Fri Feb 28, 2025 

INDEX:

Mains Articles:

1. A Leap Backward for Maternity Entitlements
2. The Bigger Tragedy is the Railways and its Systemic Inertia
3. A Message to District Magistrates and the Police
4. Slow, Unsteady: Influential Criminals Should Not Be Allowed to Evade Justice Indefinitely
5. Water Blight: Scientific Risk Assessment Prior to Undertaking Tunnel Work is a Must
6. Why Are PwDs Worried About DPDP Rules?

Prelims Articles:

1. Over 70% Farmers Still Use Cash to Sell Their Produce
2. EU Says Ready to Address India’s Specific Concerns on Carbon Tax Levy on Imports
3. Indian Peacekeepers Serve with Commitment: UN
4. Coal-Fired Power Plants in India Cut Rice, Wheat Yield by Up to 10%
5. Govt. Opposes Plea to Ban Convicted Politicians for Life
6. Trump’s Russia-Ukraine Policy Hangs Over EU-India Talks

1. Trump 2.0 and the New Matrix of U.S.-India Defence Ties

Syllabus Mapping
Mains-GS-II: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Groupings and Agreements.
Context and Background
• Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the U.S. on February 13, 2025, resulted in key agreements to boost India-U.S. defense ties.
• Key defense acquisitions include:
   o Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGM).
   o Stryker Infantry Combat Vehicles (ICV).
   o More P-8I maritime patrol aircraft for the Indian Navy.
• A new 10-year framework for U.S.-India Major Defense Partnership is set to be signed.
Significance of U.S.-India Defence Ties
• Enhancing India’s Defence Capabilities:
   o Strengthens self-reliance (Atmanirbhar Bharat) in defense manufacturing.
   o Facilitates technology transfer and joint production.
• Strengthening Indo-Pacific Security:
   o Ensures regional maritime security through P-8I aircraft.
   o Supports India’s counterbalance to China’s growing assertiveness.
• Defence Interoperability with the U.S.:
   o Enables seamless military coordination and technology integration.
   o Strengthens India’s role as a strategic U.S. ally.
Key Agreements in the New Defence Framework
A. Joint Production and Technology Transfer
• India to co-produce Javelin missiles and Stryker combat vehicles, improving local manufacturing.
• Joint development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and autonomous defense systems between L3Harris and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL).
• India to purchase more P-8I aircraft to strengthen maritime domain awareness (MDA).
• Autonomous Systems Initiative launched under PM Modi and former President Trump.
B. Strengthening Defence Logistics and Trade
• Interoperability initiatives to integrate India into U.S. defense supply chains.
• Increased intelligence-sharing and security cooperation.
C. Expansion of Undersea, Space, and Air Defense Cooperation
• India-U.S. reviewing undersea warfare collaboration.
• Joint research in space security and missile defense.
Challenges in U.S.-India Defence Cooperation
A. Issues in Technology Transfer
• The joint statement was silent on General Electric (GE) Aerospace's F-404 GE-IN-20 engines for the Tejas Mark 1A fighter jet.
• Uncertainty in U.S. commitment to 80% Transfer of Technology (ToT) to HAL.
• Similar issues in the past led to France’s Rafale winning over U.S. fighter jets.
B. Constraints on Integrating F-35 Lightning II Fighter Aircraft
• Trump suggested India could purchase F-35 fighter jets, but challenges exist:
   o High cost: The F-35 costs $80 million per unit.
   o Operational and Infrastructure Gaps in the Indian Air Force (IAF).
   o Lack of maintenance and supply chain support for F-35 in India.
   o U.S. stringent end-use monitoring policies.
C. Slow Modernization of IAF Fleet
• India faces delays in replacing outdated MiG-21 squadrons.
• IAF's medium fighter aircraft (MMRCA) project for 114 jets remains uncertain.
D. Risk of Political Uncertainty
• Changing U.S. political leadership could alter defense agreements.
• Dependency on U.S. technology may limit India’s strategic autonomy.
Way Forward for Strengthening India-U.S. Defence Ties
A. Ensuring Faster Transfer of Technology
• India must negotiate stronger terms for ToT, especially for GE fighter jet engines.
• Expanding joint defense research and indigenous production.
B. Balancing Procurement with Self-Reliance
• India should prioritize domestic fighter jet production (Tejas, AMCA) while selectively acquiring U.S. technology.
• Reducing over-reliance on U.S. weapons systems.
C. Strengthening Defence Infrastructure for Advanced Weapon Systems
• Upgrading airbases and maintenance facilities for next-gen aircraft.
• Investing in stealth and electronic warfare technology.
D. Diversifying Defence Imports
• Maintaining a mix of U.S., French, Israeli, and indigenous defense acquisitions to ensure flexibility.
• Accelerating the 114 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) project.

2. Will the U.S.'s Changed Ukraine Policy End the Russia-Ukraine War?

Syllabus Mapping
Mains-GS-II: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Groupings Affecting India’s Interests.
Key Developments in the U.S. Policy Shift
A. Change from Military to Economic Priorities
• Trump has argued that the U.S. should recover the $350 billion spent on Ukraine by securing economic deals rather than continuing military aid.
• The U.S. seeks economic engagement in Ukraine through rare earth mineral deals, rather than committing to long-term military support.
B. Pressure on Ukraine for a Peace Deal
• Trump criticizes Zelenskyy for continuing the war and is pushing Ukraine to negotiate territorial compromises with Russia.
• The European Union prefers the war to continue, fearing a diplomatic resolution could favor Russia.
C. Turkey as a Mediator
• Turkey previously brokered a deal between Russia and Ukraine in 2022, but it was scuttled by the U.S. and the U.K..
• The Riyadh meeting signals a potential revival of diplomatic efforts, although Ukraine remains resistant to territorial losses.
Geopolitical Significance of the Policy Shift
A. U.S. Strategy in a Changing Global Order
• The U.S. now sees the war as a "black hole" of funds with diminishing military gains for Ukraine.
• Trump’s "peace through economy" approach indicates a realignment of U.S. foreign policy towards strategic resource control.
B. Impact on Europe and NATO
• European countries prefer continued war to prevent a Russia-favorable settlement.
• A U.S.-Russia deal could lead to weakened NATO influence in Eastern Europe.
C. Russia’s Gains and Strategic Position
• Russia holds the upper hand militarily, with Ukraine’s counteroffensive largely failing.
• Putin’s conditions for peace include Ukraine ceding territory, which Zelenskyy refuses.
Challenges to a Peace Deal
A. Ukraine’s Resistance to Territorial Concessions
• Zelenskyy refuses to cede any territory, despite U.S. pressure.
• Losing Donbas and other occupied areas would be seen as a political failure for Ukraine.
B. Proxy War Dynamics
• The war is not just Ukraine vs. Russia, but also a larger NATO-Russia conflict.
• Ultra-nationalist groups in Ukraine oppose peace talks, making negotiations difficult.
C. India’s Role as a Mediator
• India has maintained neutrality in the conflict and has diplomatic ties with both the U.S. and Russia.
• However, the shift towards Riyadh as the diplomatic center suggests that the Middle East may play a bigger role in mediation than India.
Way Forward: Paths to Ending the War
A. Strengthening Diplomatic Engagement
• A multilateral peace framework involving the U.S., Russia, Ukraine, and the EU is needed.
• Turkey and Saudi Arabia can act as neutral mediators.
B. Addressing Security Concerns
• Ukraine needs security guarantees from NATO to ensure any territorial concessions do not lead to further Russian aggression.
• Russia needs economic incentives to consider a long-term truce.
C. Economic Reconstruction Over Military Prolongation
• If the U.S. shifts focus from military aid to economic reconstruction, Ukraine can recover without prolonged war.
• Investment in rebuilding infrastructure rather than war funding could be a more sustainable approach.

Choose your courses